TNEstudy Transnational education (TNE) · cross-border programme delivery
Start an enquiry

Cross-jurisdiction

Joint and dual awards across five jurisdictions: how registration actually works

Five host jurisdictions publish different registration paths for joint and dual awards; Mainland China requires education-authority approval and lists both institutions and programmes on its national supervision platform, while Hong Kong regulates the course rather than the campus.

Published 2026-07-28

For a partnership office evaluating a joint or dual award, the first surprise is that “joint/dual award” is not a single legal category anywhere. Each host jurisdiction covered by this site publishes a regime built around a different anchor: the institution, the programme, the course, or the campus. This briefing maps how the five jurisdictions classify such arrangements, and where the published record stops. It is compiled from official regulator and instrument texts verified on 2026-07-28. This site reads those published rules; it does not represent any regulator’s position and gives no legal advice.

The anchor differs by jurisdiction

The single most useful question a cooperation-programme office can ask is: what does this jurisdiction regulate — the institution, the programme, the course, or the campus? The answer determines where a joint or dual award appears in the public record.

  1. Mainland China — the anchor is the Chinese-foreign cooperatively-run school or programme. Both institutions and programmes require approval by the education authorities, and the arrangement is published on the national supervision platform.
  2. Hong Kong SAR — the anchor is the non-local course. Courses leading to a non-local award must be registered or exempted under the Non-local Higher and Professional Education (Regulation) Ordinance (Cap. 493). The Ordinance regulates courses and their advertising, not campus entities.
  3. Singapore — the anchor is the locally registered private education institution. The foreign award is delivered through that institution, and the regulator’s powers attach to the local institution rather than to the overseas awarding university.
  4. Malaysia — the foreign university branch campus is a recognised category of private higher education institution under the Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996 (Act 555). The award comes from the parent university and programmes are accredited by the Malaysian Qualifications Agency.
  5. United Arab Emirates — a dual track applies. An emirate authority licenses the campus (KHDA in Dubai, ADEK in Abu Dhabi), while federal recognition of the award requires Commission for Academic Accreditation (CAA) institutional licensure and programme accreditation.

Where the institution and programme are the anchor (Mainland China)

In Mainland China cooperation is defined as cooperation between a foreign and a Chinese institution. Both the cooperatively-run school or programme require approval, and the foreign certificate registration is published on the supervision platform. A dual award therefore appears as part of an approved programme record rather than as a standalone course listing.

We could not confirm from an official source any regime permitting a wholly foreign-owned degree campus; the branch-campus status is recorded as unconfirmed. A January 2025 State Council adjustment allows wholly foreign-owned for-profit vocational skills training institutions in Beijing, but that is vocational skills training, not degree-level higher education. A cooperation office should confirm whether a proposed award falls within an approved programme before relying on it. Where the relevant field is not published, the compliance coordination team can be engaged and will respond within one business day.

Where the course is the anchor (Hong Kong and Singapore)

In Hong Kong the registration or exemption attaches to the regulated non-local course. A course run in collaboration with a local higher education institution may be exempted, and purely distance-learning courses need not register but may do so voluntarily. Advertising a regulated course that is neither registered nor exempted is an offence under Cap. 493. The published record therefore tells you about the course’s regulatory status, not about the campus operating it.

In Singapore the private education institution is the registered entity. It must register its external degree courses with SkillsFuture Singapore, and the award is conferred by the overseas awarding body. We could not confirm from an official source whether EduTrust certification is a precondition for enrolling international students, so this site does not assert it. The practical point for a BD lead is that the counterpart you contract with is the locally registered institution, and the overseas awarding body sits behind it.

Where the campus is the anchor (Malaysia and the UAE)

Malaysia recognises the foreign university branch campus as a category of private higher education institution under Act 555. Curriculum comes from the parent university, and programmes are accredited by the Malaysian Qualifications Agency and listed on the Malaysian Qualifications Register. The published record here is campus-centric: you can verify the branch campus as an approved institution and check each programme on the national register.

The UAE operates a dual track that answers two different questions. An emirate permit (KHDA in Dubai, ADEK in Abu Dhabi) lets the campus operate. CAA institutional licensure and programme accreditation is what places the award on the National Register and confers federal recognition. Education zone authorities license branch campuses to operate but do not by themselves grant federal degree recognition. A cooperation office evaluating a UAE campus must therefore check both tracks rather than treating the operating permit as proof of recognition.

Reading “dual award” in the published record

A published record that names a foreign awarding body does not by itself prove the award will be conferred, or that the host authority recognises it for local purposes. The record may show the course is approved, the campus is licensed, or the programme is accredited — each of which is a different link in the chain. This site reads the published rules; it does not represent the regulator’s position. Confirmation of whether a specific joint or dual award is conferred, and whether it is recognised, sits with the awarding institution and the relevant authority, and is not published in a single field.

Practical checks before you rely on a registration

  1. Identify the anchor in the host jurisdiction — institution, programme, course, or campus.
  2. Locate the record on the official register named for that jurisdiction.
  3. Confirm the foreign awarding body is named in the record, not merely implied in marketing material.
  4. Confirm the record’s status and any expiry date shown; an expired approval is not a current authorisation.
  5. Where recognition is separate from operation (for example the UAE federal track), check both tracks.
  6. Treat any “not published” field as unknown; do not assume a fact that the official source does not state.
  7. For case-specific verification, the compliance coordination team can be engaged and will respond within one business day.

What this briefing does and does not say

This briefing is compiled from official regulator and instrument texts verified on the date shown in the jurisdiction dataset. It is not legal advice and does not represent any regulator. Where a field could not be confirmed from an official source, this site records it as not published rather than guessing. Tuition and fee amounts are not published in this dataset; confirm them with the regulator or a licensed adviser. For case-specific positions, confirm with the regulator or a licensed adviser.

Key takeaways

  1. “Joint/dual award” maps to different legal anchors across the five jurisdictions — institution and programme (Mainland China), course (Hong Kong, Singapore), and campus (Malaysia, UAE).
  2. A published registration names the arrangement but does not by itself guarantee the award is conferred or locally recognised.
  3. In the UAE the emirate permit and federal CAA recognition answer different questions; both tracks should be checked.
  4. Fields recorded as not published mean the fact is unconfirmed from an official source — do not assume them.
  5. This site reads published rules and does not represent any regulator; confirm case-specific positions with the regulator or a licensed adviser.

Sources

  1. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China — Information Platform for Supervision of Chinese-Foreign Cooperation in Running Schools (https://www.crs.jsj.edu.cn/)
  2. Hong Kong Education Bureau, Non-local Courses Registry — Non-local Higher and Professional Education (Regulation) Ordinance (Cap. 493) (https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap493)
  3. SkillsFuture Singapore — Private Education Act 2009 and the register of private education institutions (https://www.ssg.gov.sg/resources/pei/)
  4. Malaysian Qualifications Agency and Department of Higher Education — Private Higher Educational Institutions Act 1996 (Act 555) (https://mohe.gov.my/en/institutions/phei)
  5. UAE Commission for Academic Accreditation and Knowledge and Human Development Authority — Standards for Institutional Licensure and Program Accreditation 2019 (https://www.moe.gov.ae/En/MediaCenter/News/Pages/accreditation2.aspx)

Read next

All briefings →